ζASR ζALPHA STOCHASTIC RESEARCH
Portfolio decision intelligence

Test the plan. See what breaks.

Compare liquidation decisions, inspect failure cases and retain reproducible evidence.

Initial engineering version · independent review and client validation pending.

The decision problem

Cash has a deadline.
The market has constraints.

01 / Settlement

Will proceeds arrive in time?

Track settled and unsettled cash, inventory locks and asset-specific settlement delays.

02 / Collective selling

What changes when others sell?

Compare the same decision with modeled competing funds and identify a finite counterexample.

03 / Decision evidence

Which assumptions drive the answer?

Inspect the reference comparison, failing cases, funding gap and reproducible input record.

A focused workflow

From portfolio to a traceable study.

Import and reconcile

Map source columns, declare units and review the portfolio before applying it.

Compare the plans

Test 48 causal sale rules against an agreed cash target, deadline and model limits.

Review and retain

Download a report, export the evidence and explicitly share a study with licensed colleagues.

Commercial path

A paid pilot.
Then an annual license.

Scoped pilot

One agreed portfolio, a cash obligation, a reference method and documented acceptance criteria.

On quotation

Indicative fee only. Final scope, data access, timing and fees are agreed before contracting.

Annual term license

Defined software use, version updates and agreed support after a successful pilot.

On quotation

Integration and customer-specific work are scoped separately. No automatic purchase is made here.

Governed delivery

Existing ASR client accounts, institution-specific access, expiry controls and reviewed release versions.

Discuss your requirements ↗
Research scope, stated clearly

Inspectable results.
Defined limitations.

Current engine

Unlevered EUR portfolios, up to 16 agreed asset buckets, daily decisions and a finite scenario grid. Counts are not probabilities, and the selected rule is not a proven global optimum.

Client validation

Synthetic peers and liquidity assumptions require validation for the intended use. No live execution, regulatory certification or superiority over other vendors has been established.